Original Article
| ||||||
Systematizing mandibular reconstruction using the resin frame method | ||||||
Junichi Hayasaka1, Shunji Sarukawa2, Hiroto Itoh3, Yoshiaki Takai4, Mikio Kusama5, Yoshiyuki Mori1, Akitoshi Katsumata6 | ||||||
1Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan
2Department of Plastic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan 3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nasu Red Cross Hospital, 1081-4 Nakadawara, Otawara-shi, Tochigi, Japan 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Oral Pathogenesis and Disease Control, Asahi University School of Dentistry, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho-shi, Gifu 501-0296, Japan 5International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 537-3 Iguchi, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi, Japan 6Department of Oral Radiology, Division of Oral Pathogenesis and Disease Control, Asahi University School of Dentistry, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho-shi, Gifu, Japan | ||||||
| ||||||
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article] [Similar article in PubMed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] |
How to cite this article |
Hayasaka J, Sarukawa S, Itoh H, Takai Y, Kusama M, Mori Y, Katsumata A. Systematizing mandibular reconstruction using the resin frame method. Edorium J Dent 2018;5:100029D01JH2018. |
ABSTRACT
|
Aims: Oral tumors are the most frequent diseases that lead to mandibular defects, but because they are so rare, it is difficult to obtain the necessary large capital investment to establish and introduce a mandibular reconstruction system. Therefore, we developed the Resin Frame method within the current facilities that objectively increases mandibular reproducibility without requiring advanced techniques. Methods: Subjects comprised 25 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by the resin frame method in the Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Jichi Medical University Hospital between October 2013 and August 2015, and 25 patients who underwent the mandibular reconstruction by the conventional method between September 2007 and November 2011. All mandibles were reconstructed using fibula or iliac bones with a reconstruction plate. The computed tomography (CT) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data before and after the operation were saved. Then, the layer function was used to fuse the pre- and postoperative CT images. Based on measured area, the concordance rate that is matching percentages between pre- and postoperative mandibles were calculated. We evaluated the difference between the concordance rate of the Resin Frame method and the conventional method of mandibular reconstruction. Results: Concordance rates for the resin frame method and conventional surgery were 75.09±6.09% and 67.39±13.44%, respectively, showing a significant difference (p=0.032, p<0.05). Conclusion: The resin frame method represents a mandibular reconstruction system that increases reproduction accuracy and can be implemented at current facilities using simple, objective techniques. Keywords: Concordance rate, Mandibular reconstruction, Resin frame method, Reproducibility |
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
|
Acknowledgements
The present study was partially funded by a MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant (grant number JP17K11683) from Japan. |
Author Contributions
Junichi Hayasaka – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Shunji Sarukawa – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Hiroto Itoh – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Yoshiaki Takai – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Mikio Kusama – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Yoshiyuki Mori – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Akitoshi Katsumata – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
Guarantor of Submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
Source of Support
None |
Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study. |
Conflict of Interest
Author declares no conflict of interest. |
Copyright
© 2018 Junichi Hayasaka et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|